Statutes
The law, not the summary of the law.
A summary paraphrases a heading, and a heading can be wrong about its own provision. We hold the enacted bill on disk, hash it, and require every finding to quote it word for word, in the section it claims to be in. A program checks that, not a reader.
Read to full depth
-
Public Law 119-101 · H.R. 6644 · enacted 2026-07-11
21st Century ROAD to Housing Act
- 1,957verified findings
- 12titles
- 59sections
- 265dates ahead
Held and sealed Enrolled bill held in three formats and hashed
One Act, to the byte. The method is what generalizes, and it runs on whichever law your work turns on. Every date these statutes set also lands on the gate calendar, and every source behind them is listed under sources.
Questions
- What does it mean to read a statute against its own text?
- Every assertion carries a quote, and the quote is checked by a program rather than by a reader. It must appear word for word in the enacted text, and it must sit inside the section it is attributed to. A claim that fails either test is discarded regardless of how confident its author was.
- Why not just read the summaries?
- Because summaries paraphrase headings, and a heading can be wrong about its own provision. Reading the enacted text surfaces the class of finding a summary structurally cannot: a section whose operative language does not do what its title says. It also catches the reverse error, where a real requirement is dropped from every summary because no secondary source noticed it.
- How many statutes are covered?
- One, to full depth, with the enrolled bill held on disk and hashed. The method is what generalizes, and it runs on whichever law a piece of work turns on.
Name the law. We read it this way.
Tell us which statute your work turns on and what you need out of it.